This could be one of the most divisive posts that I’ll ever write. And I’ve just written some stuff on GAFCON. This is a position paper. On sport. In the midst of widespread confusion, there are some things that we need to clarify. I’ve just watched a BBC programme on Olympic hopefuls. I’m distraught at what we’re now prepared to call a sport. It wouldn’t have happened in my day. There’s a great need for clear thinking and leadership on this issue. I’m happy to step up to the plate. Theerfore, let me offer a defining statement; the Balham Statament let’s call it. We’re not a break away faction of reactive schismatics. We just want to recapture the heart of sport. Others may want to sign up and join the bandwagon. I’m thinking of starting a petition. To my mind, for something to qualify as a sport it must involve the following four features

1. competition

2. technical expertise

3. athletic ability 

4. a ball

Therefore, cycling is a recreation. Rowing is a technique. Darts is a competition. Rugby, football, cricket and hockey - now they’re sports. Golf isn’t because it doesn’t require athletic ability. The same goes for snooker. Grand Prix is driving quickly. Swimming is a technique but add a ball and water polo is a sport. What this of course means is that the Olympic Games is technically not a sporting competition but an athletic one. It also means that the BBC covers very little sport, but that’s a rant for another time!