For an audio download of this talk go to http://www.christchurchbalham.org.uk/ccb/sermons.php
From time to time I find myself watching ‘Never Mind the Buzzcocks’, the TV music quiz. I know, I know, I need to get out more and it’s not the most wholesome viewing at times. But one of the rounds involves the contestants trying to identify the real band member from a line up of five similar looking people. It’s harder than it sounds. They don’t pick current stars. The production company go for ageing ‘has beens’ or faceless one hit wonders. BUt it’s really an exercise in trying to distinguish the authentic from the fake.
Jesus does just that in (31). In (30) John told us that many had believed in Jesus. But now Jesus began to sift the authentic from the fake. It’s as though Jesus puts everyone into a huge sieve and as he speaks he shakes us up and one by one the people who disagree fall through so that only those who are his remain. I know that’s not the way a sieve works but you get the picture! That happened as he mentioned three things that the world finds unacceptable. Only those who hold to Jesus’ teaching and are genuinely his disciples will agree with what he said.
It may be that he has exposed our phoney faith.
We’re continuing our year long enterprise, called the John Project, of trying to learn deeply from one big book of the Bible. John is a brilliant book for us because it exposes us to Jesus so that we might exercise faith, or trust, in him. That’s crucial whether we’d already describe ourselves as one of his followers or that’s a decision we’re still in the process of making.
In looking at this passage we’re trying to analyse an argument, which can be difficult. Sometimes it’s hard to follow the thread because the speaker keeps changing. But in this case it’s made easier since the argument occurs between two parties. It’s between Jesus and his opponents. The three issues at stake in this argument are liberty, paternity and authority.
-
Liberty concerns whether they were free,
-
Paternity concerns who was their father and
-
Authority concerns who they were talking to Let’s take those in turn.
1. They were unwilling to accept that they were slaves to sin (31-36)
The argument started on the subject of liberty. The issue was freedom. Jesus’ opponents were convinced that they were free because they were descendants of Abraham. Jesus thought otherwise. Let’s pick it up in (31).
31 So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed in him, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, 32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Jesus explained that genuine believers hold to his teaching. Authentic faith perseveres in believing and obeying what Jesus taught. The benefit of belief is that Jesus’ followers enjoy not enslavement but freedom. That freedom comes through knowing the truth. The truth is the truth as it’s revealed by Jesus. It’s the gospel that concerns him. And knowing the gospel will set us free.
a. In response they claimed never to have been enslaved
33 They answered him, “We are offspring of Abraham and have never been enslaved to anyone. How is it that you say, ‘You will become free’?”
It was incomprehensible to them that Israelites, God’s historic people, should need freedom. They had a very selective memory of Israel’s history. It’s hard to think of a major world empire that hadn’t enslaved this nation at some stage! But the point is that, as Abraham’s descendants and God’s favoured nation, they considered themselves automatically exempt from trouble. In their opinion, they had no need for the freedom Jesus offered. It becomes clear that in their unwillingness to hold to Jesus’ teaching these disciples demonstrate that they are anything but genuine.
b. So Jesus then made it clear what type of slavery he had in mind
34 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin.
The slavery Jesus had in mind was a spiritual enslavement to sinful rebellion against God demonstrated in a refusal to let Him direct what we think and what we do. I think there are two ideas here. The fact that we sin identifies our slavery. If we sin we’re slaves and so we need to be freed. But also the practice of sin enslaves us. Our habitual devotion to sin reinforces our habitual devotion to sin! We can’t break free from our sinful habits.
c. But Jesus as the Son promised to set slaves free
35 The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. 36 So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Unlike a son a slave has no permanent place in the family. Jesus, as the true Son of God the Father, can liberate slaves. The freedom that he brings is both a freedom from sin’s penalty and sin’s practice. Belief in the gospel releases us from sin’s penalty, which is God’s judgement so we have nothing to fear from God’s accounting. And belief in the gospel frees us from sin’s practice so that sin isn’t the only lifestyle available to us. Of course both aspects of the promise are completely fulfilled in the New Creation. We’re not completely free from sin’s presence at this stage since we still have a sinful nature. But we do enjoy the ability to say no to sin at this stage.
Jesus’ analysis, not only of his opponents but of us all, is that we’re enslaved to sin. At one stage we were addicted to rebellion against him. For some of us that is an addiction that’s been overcome by the gospel. For others of us it’s a destructive addiction that we need to face up to and be freed from. If we’re prepared to stop for a moment we know that to be true. When was the last time you had a sin free day? You haven’t have you? We can’t stop sinning. And like everything that we practice we get better and better at it. We know that practice makes perfect. The more we do something the better we get and the more automatic it becomes.
Jonny Wilkinson, possibly the world’s finest ever rugby kicker has a metronomic approach because it’s a well rehearsed routine forged on the practice ground. I used to do the same thing. I had a bag of 10 rugby balls and would go out for hours on end. Then I got a life. Or was it a wife. Perhaps they were the same thing for me!
Sin has become a habit and we’re very skilled at it. Jesus promised to liberate us from this simply through belief in his gospel.
2. They were unwilling to accept that they were children of the devil (37-47)
The argument now moved onto the subject of paternity. The issue at stake was who their father was. They were convinced they belonged to Abraham and God. Jesus thought otherwise. Let’s pick it up in (37)
a. Where they claimed Abraham was their father
37 I know that you are offspring of Abraham; yet you seek to kill me because my word finds no place in you. 38 I speak of what I have seen with my Father, and you do what you have heard from your father.” 39 They answered him, “Abraham is our father.” Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, 40 but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. This is not what Abraham did. 41 You are doing the works your father did.”
Jesus addressed the issue of their spiritual heritage because they tied their freedom to their descent from Abraham. He was happy to accept that they shared Abraham’s blood but not his faith. He hinted that their paternity was to be located elsewhere. Jesus’ opponents protested that Abraham was their father. But Jesus contested that their behaviour was diametrically opposed to how Abraham behaved. He believed God’s word, they were rejecting it. And so they must have had another father.
b. They then claimed God was their father
[41] They said to him, “We were not born of sexual immorality. We have one Father—even God.” 42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. 43 Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word.
Jesus’ opponents alluded to the irregularities surrounding Jesus’ birth and then claimed God as their father. But if they really were God’s children then they’d love His Son because it’d be like loving one of the family. They couldn’t understand what Jesus said but not because he was a poor communicator but because they would not hear his word. It was a wilful rejection of his voice as an authority on these issues.
c. And so Jesus claimed the devil was their father
44 You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 But because I tell the truth, you do not believe me. 46 Which one of you convicts me of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe me? 47 Whoever is of God hears the words of God. The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.”
Jesus argued that they belonged to the devil. Can you imagine that scene? I’m amazed they didn’t pick up stones to throw at him at this point! Jesus said that the evidence for their demonic heritage was that their shared the devil’s ambitions. Like father like son. First, he was a murderer and like him they wanted to deprive people of life by killing the Son. Secondly, he was a liar and like him they wanted to distort the truth by denying the Jesus’ identity as the Son.
Competitiveness is the issue in our family at the moment. Everything is something to be won. Whether it’s finishing breakfast cereal, draughts or night time milk everything is a race. When he doesn’t win we get strops, tears and major tantrums. Those of you who know our family well know that this is a trait that he’s learnt from his father. Poor bloke he can’t help but take after his father!
Jesus explained that there are only two fathers in the world. There’s God and the devil. We either belong to one or the other. Let me ask you who your father is. If God is our father are we showing the family likeness? Do we look like our father? But if the devil is our father, are we comfortable with that? We’re deprived of the spiritual life that the Son alone can give us. We’ve distorted the truth about who he is. Jesus says that your life is characterised by death and deceit. Is that an existence you’re prepared to accept?
3. They were unwilling to accept they were talking with God (48-59)
The argument now moved on to the subject of authority. Jesus’ opponents thought he was a demon possessed, self deluded, foreigner. Jesus thought otherwise. Let’s pick it up in (48)
48 The Jews answered him, “Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?”
They’d clearly failed with the theological argument and so they resorted to abuse.
a. Jesus honoured his father
49 Jesus answered, “I do not have a demon, but I honour my Father, and you dishonour me. 50 Yet I do not seek my own glory; there is One who seeks it, and he is the judge. 51 Truly, truly, I say to you, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death.”
But Jesus’ behaviour though was not the result of demon possession but a determination to obey his father who had sent him to reveal the truth. By refusing to respond appropriately to this revealed truth they had failed to honour the Son and the Father who sent him. They, like us will be judged for that. Nevertheless, Jesus offered them life through his word. This is the freedom that he was walking about earlier. Belief in his gospel word brings freedom from sin’s penalty, which is death.
52 The Jews said to him, “Now we know that you have a demon! Abraham died, as did the prophets, yet you say, ‘If anyone keeps my word, he will never taste death.’ 53 Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died? And the prophets died! Who do you make yourself out to be?”
With some degree of logic Jesus’ opponents pointed out that both Abraham and the prophets had obeyed God’s word and nevertheless had died. They concluded that for Jesus to claim that his word was capable of providing resurrection life was so utterly preposterous that only demonic possession could account for such self deluded nonsense!
b. But Jesus refuted the accusation of self promotion
54 Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God.’ 55 But you have not known him. I know him. If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and I keep his word.
There was substance to Jesus’ claims. They weren’t merely empty rhetoric. He really is the Son of the Father. For him to deny that would be to deceive people and he could not do that. This wasn’t a case of Jesus talking himself up.
c. Then with breathtaking audacity Jesus claimed pre-existence
56 Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad.” 57 So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” 59 So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.
Abraham received the gospel promise of the future Kingdom of God. He joyfully anticipated the time in which those promises would be fulfilled. Jesus said that he looked forward to the day of his arrival. Jesus’ opponents pointed out the obvious fact that there was a discrepancy in age. Jesus’ answer is incredible, ‘before Abraham was, I am’. His point was not that he was Abraham’s contemporary but that he was Abraham’s God. The words ‘I am’ are the words God used to reveal himself to Moses in Exodus and Jesus now takes them to his lips. He was fully aware of what he is claiming. Though it may not be immediately clear to us what Jesus meant, his opponents got the gist. They thought it was blasphemous and prepared to kill him.
I went with a couple of atheistic friends this week to a debate between a Christian and an atheist about the existence of God. The Christian case, in my opinion, was compelling and unanswered. The single strongest strand of evidence for God’s existence is the evidence provided by Jesus of Nazareth. But just as in Jesus’ exchange with his opponents they weren’t persuaded.
They came face to face with God and denied it. But Jesus didn’t stop being God simply because they didn’t agree. It is objectively true that he is God regardless of our subjective opinions.
Conclusion
There were three issues over which Jesus and his opponents differed. They are three issues that reveal whether we’re a true disciple of Jesus and hold to his teaching or whether we’re not.
They’re not minor points of disagreement. As a result of their discussion there was no common ground. Why is that? There are hints throughout the passage.
-
37 I know that you are offspring of Abraham; yet you seek to kill me because my word finds no place in you
-
43 Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word.
-
47 Whoever is of God hears the words of God. The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.”
How will it be possible for these people to have their minds changed? For the answer to that conundrum we’ll need to come back to hear John 9 and the description of Jesus’ sight giving ministry.