John 5 - The Authority of the Son

Audio download of this sermon available here http://www.christchurchbalham.org.uk/ccb/sermons.php

The story’s told of the Emperor Napoleon granting a visiting Russian Prince the opportunity to pardon a prisoner. To pardon someone facing the death penalty for their crimes. They went to the prison and interviewed the men held there so that the Russian Prince could decide who should benefit from the Emperor’s pardon. Everyone he spoke to professed their innocence and why it was unfair that they were held in captivity. Except one. He freely acknowledged his guilt and professed his deep regret and sorrow for what he’d done. Of all the guilty prisoners he alone was pardoned and given life.

We’re thinking this morning about an eternal pardon from another ruler, from a judge who’s prepared to give life to those who accept their need of his saving activity.

We’re back in John’s gospel, a selective account of the activity of Jesus Christ

  • Written by one of his closest associates
  • Written to persuade us that Jesus is the promised Christ of the OT
  • Written so that all those who believe what’s said about him and take him at his word would receive spiritual life

Our account this morning concerns a miracle.

The miracle (1-9)

5:1 After this there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 2 Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate [which perhaps looked something like this] a pool, in Aramaic called Bethesda, which has five roofed colonnades [which has been discovered by archaeologists and looks like this]. 3 In these lay a multitude of invalids—blind, lame, and paralysed. Jesus walked to the local swimming baths, surrounded by beautiful stone colonnades, draped in Mediterranean sun only to find disabled people strewn across the side. 5 One man was there who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. 6 When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had already been there a long time, he said to him, “Do you want to be healed?” 7 The sick man answered him, “Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up, and while I am going another steps down before me.” He selected a man lying on the side, unable to get into the water, obstructed by others pushing past him in their eagerness to savour the alleged healing properties of the waters. Jesus approached him and asked him whether he wanted healing. The man assumed Jesus was referring to the waters. With a single word of authority Jesus commanded the man to grab his mat and get up. 8 Jesus said to him, “Get up, take up your bed, and walk.” 9 And at once the man was healed, and he took up his bed and walked.

As with all Jesus’ miracles recorded in this gospel this was a sign. It was pointing to something significant. As a sign it pointed to Jesus’ identity [who he is] and his activity [what he came to do]. In the OT prophet Isaiah, writing 700 years before these incidents, God had promised that he would rescue his people and in that day of rescue ‘the lame would leap like a deer’ [Isaiah 35]. When Jesus selected this paralysed man he knew what he was doing. He healed him out of compassion but he had another purpose in mind, he was announcing the arrival of the agent of God’s rescue. This act of compassion took place on a Saturday and sparked an unattractive controversy. Look at (9).

The accusation (9-16)

Now that day was the Sabbath. 10 So the Jews said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath, and it is not lawful for you to take up your bed.” 11 But he answered them, “The man who healed me, that man said to me, ‘Take up your bed, and walk.’” 12 They asked him, “Who is the man who said to you, ‘Take up your bed and walk’?” 13 Now the man who had been healed did not know who it was, for Jesus had withdrawn, as there was a crowd in the place. 14 Afterward Jesus found him in the temple and said to him, “See, you are well! Sin no more, that nothing worse may happen to you.” [In which Jesus is not saying that there’s a direct correspondence between sin and personal suffering but in his opinion there’s something worse than being paralysed for 38 years.] 15 The man went away and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had healed him. 16 And this was why the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because he was doing these things on the Sabbath.

Jesus’ opponents alleged that he’d performed what was prohibited on the Sabbath. He had not. The Law prohibited work on the Sabbath but that could hardly apply to a situation where an incapacitated man is miraculously healed, gets up and walks home with his mat under his arm for the first time in 38 years. But Jesus was tracked down and taken to task for his breach of their Sabbath regulations. Jesus defended healing the paralytic with an outrageous claim. Look at (17).

The defence (17)

17 But Jesus answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I am working.”

God has always worked because without his labour the universe falls to pieces. And because God can work all week so too can his Son. Jesus was saying that since Dad thought it was OK to work it was fine for him. That justification is occasionally used in our house for not switching off the TV and coming to the supper table! The implication of Jesus’ response was not lost on the Jews. Look at (18)

The implication (18)

18 This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

They saw his claim for what it was. In claiming God as his unique Father, Jesus was claiming to be divine.

If we wanted to prove that we were someone’s equal we’d need to be able to prove it wouldn’t we? I can claim to be the equal of Eric Clapton. It’s an easy claim to make. But to make it with any degree of integrity I’d need to be able to play a guitar and fill the Albert Hall with people who’ve paid a fortune to hear me. I don’t even own a guitar! [That’s no longer true - I was given one for Christmas].

Jesus claimed to be God’s equal. That’s an easy claim to make. But, he pulled off the kinds of things only God can do. We have to admit that, before we get into his persuasive theological justification, there’s real validity to this man’s claims. What follows is Jesus’ denial of the charge of blasphemy. 

The denial (19-29)

From Jesus’ repeated use of the introductory phrase ‘truly, truly, I say to you’ it’s safe to assume that there are three stages in his argument. Let’s look at each of those in turn. We’ll apply them at the end.

  • They concern what Jesus will do (19-23)
  • Who benefits from what Jesus will do (24)
  • How it is that Jesus can do what he will do (25-29)

1. the Son does only what the Father shows him (19-23)

In the first stage of his argument Jesus wants to establish that his equality with God must be carefully understood. Look at (19).

19 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father does, that the Son does likewise.

Although equal with God he’s not another God. He doesn’t initiate and execute his own agenda. The Son is not in competition with the Father. He’s in a relationship of willing submission to his Father’s authority. The Son is not like a stroppy teenager who’s always pushing the boundaries. He’s not a loose canon in the Godhead. He only does what his Father does.

The reason the Son can do what the Father does is explained in (20).

20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all that he himself is doing. And greater works than these will he show him, so that you may marvel.

The basis for the Son’s ministry of performing miraculous signs is that the Father withholds nothing from him. Such is the Father’s love for the Son He delights to show him what He’s doing.

When the kids come into my study during the day it’s great answering the question ‘Daddy what are you doing?’ We share our work with those we love.

What constitutes Jesus’ work is then explained in the next two verses. God makes it clear that he shares with His Son two divine prerogatives [or rights]. Look at (21).

21 For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will.

In the first place the Son like the Father can give life to whomever he chooses. Jesus is the one who will raise the dead and give us an eternal existence beyond the grave. And look at (22).

22 The Father judges no one, but has given all judgement to the Son,

In the second place the Father has entrusted the final day judgement to the Son. Jesus is the one with whom we must reckon when our lives are assessed.

These two activities demonstrate that the Son does whatever the Father does. The reason why the Father has entrusted to the Son these two divine prerogatives of giving life and executing judgement is explained in (23).

23 that all may honour the Son, just as they honour the Father. Whoever does not honour the Son does not honour the Father who sent him.

The Father’s intention is that people would honour the Son in exactly the same way that they honour the Father. In fact Jesus goes further and claims that it’s impossible to honour the Father if we won’t honour His Son. We’ll think about that more in a moment.

We’ve been concerned with what Jesus will do. Now we move on to who will benefit from what Jesus is going to do.

2. the Son gives life and acquits those who believe (24)

In the second part of his answer Jesus now explains who benefits from his willing submission to what his Father wants him to do. Look at (24).

24 Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgement, but has passed from death to life.

The Father has given two divine prerogatives to the Son. Giving life and executing judgement. Jesus then teaches that it’s possible to have that eternal life and be acquitted from the condemnation of judgement in the here and now. We don’t need to wait until we’re dead before we receive life. And we don’t have to wait until we’re before the throne of judgement before we receive the verdict. Anyone who believes the Son’s words crosses over from spiritual death to spiritual life. The Son has power to change someone’s destiny from condemnation and death to life. We’ve been concerned with what Jesus will do and who will benefit. Now we consider how Jesus can do what he says he’s going to do.

3. the Son has life in himself and authority to judge (25-29)

In the third part of his answer Jesus now explains how it is that he’s able to give life and acquit those who believe. Look at (25).

25 “Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself.

Jesus says that he can give life because the Father has granted the Son to have life in himself just as the Father has life in himself.

27 And he has given him authority to execute judgement, because he is the Son of Man.

Jesus says that he can execute judgement because the Father has delegated His authority to judge to his Son. In fulfilment of Daniel 7 in which the Ancient of Days, a description for God, delegates authority to a Son of Man, the glorious heavenly figure who would rule forever.

28 Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgement.

As unusual as it is for God to have a Son to whom he has delegated authority to give life and execute judgement with a word we shouldn’t be surprised. None of his present life giving activity should surprise us since Jesus is the judge on the last day and so he is able to decide the destiny of someone ahead of that time. On the last day this same voice will summon the dead from their graves and raise some to everlasting life and others to everlasting condemnation. Those who are raised to life are those who have done ‘good’. This cannot mean that we earn our salvation. That would fly in the face of what Jesus has been teaching about the need to believe in him in this very conversation. If we flick on to chapter 6:28 we’ll see that work is used as a synonym for belief.

6:28 Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” 29 Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.”

Concluding Implications

In the miraculous healing of the paralysed man Jesus acted like the Son of God. In the ensuing discussion with his opponents Jesus claimed to be the Son of God. He was either telling lies or he was telling the truth. They’re the only two options.

If he was telling lies he either did so knowingly or unknowingly. If he did so knowingly he wilfully deceived people and got them to believe a lie. If he did so in ignorance he was deluded and we put people like that into psychiatric care. The only other option is that Jesus was telling the truth. That’s where the facts point and it’s the only sensible conclusion. But so what?

John includes three concluding implications within the text.

We must honour the Son

We have to treat Jesus Christ in the same way that we ought to treat God. It’s impossible to honour God without honouring Jesus Christ. And so the value of any religious ideology must be measured by the honour with which it treats Jesus Christ. Whatever the post modern pluralistic mindset says there are no grounds for claiming to serve and follow God if we do not serve and follow Jesus Christ. That might not be popular but it’s right.

We must believe in the Son

Two great events lie ahead of us. One is our death and the other is our judgement. The fear of both can be removed in one simple action, belief in the Son. If we’re to pass from death to life it’s the only response. Jesus is the Son of God. He shares the ability to grant life and execute judgement. We must accept that we need his life and we need his pardon and believe in him. For those of us who are not Christians this fear ought to be especially acute. Death is a frightening prospect and the idea that we’ll be held accountable for what we’ve done with the life God has given us is especially unsettling. The great news of the gospel is that it needn’t be. We can know the verdict on our lives ahead of time and we can know that death will not be the last chapter in our lives. For those of us who are Christians we should know this but we forget it don’t we. Most of us struggle with uncertainty concerning death and whether we’ll exist beyond the grave. It’s rarely a settled conviction in our heart. And because of our propensity to sin the idea that God really will find us acceptable in the judgement seems more and more unlikely. This week will see us repeat the sins of our past, we may even add in some new ones such is the capacity of the human heart for wicked invention. We have it on the authority of the judge that on the day of our reckoning he’ll acquit us. He’ll declare us innocent, not because we are but because he has already endured the punishment for our guilt.

We must not be surprised by the Son

We can’t go through life dismissing what Jesus says he can do. As incredible as it sounds he really can give us spiritual life and he really can acquit us from the judgement. It won’t do to come to the end of our lives meet Jesus face to face and say, ‘I had no idea you could do that!’ or ‘You’re quite something aren’t you!’

John 4 - The Saviour for the World

Audio download of this sermon available here http://www.christchurchbalham.org.uk/ccb/sermons.php

I sometimes think that Christianity suffers from the same problem as the gym. Holmes Place regularly sends fliers offering gym membership to our neighbourhood. The trouble is that the fliers are full of trim people whose bodies are, in a word, ‘taut’. That’s incredibly off putting for most ordinary people whose bodies are, in a word, ‘relaxed’! Their promotional material says ‘the gym is for fit people come and join us’. It excludes the very people who need the gym most!

Church can suffer from the same problem when we’re heard to be saying morally upstanding citizens with impeccable religious heritage need only apply. Who do we think the kingdom of God is for? What type of people do we think that Jesus is after? We’re about to learn from Jesus himself who he’s after.

It’s worth recognising that within this section of John there’s been a developing line of thought.

  • In chapter 2 we had the ‘what’ of the Kingdom – what it’s about is a messianic banquet
  • In chapter 3 we had the ‘how’ of the kingdom – how we get in is the new birth, supernatural life from the Spirit
  • And now in chapter 4 we’ve got the ‘who’ of the kingdom – as Jesus embarks on a very successful recruiting drive in a Samaritan neighbourhood we learn it’s not for Jews only. 

This is one of a number of private conversations that John has selected as he continues to try and persuade us to place our faith in Jesus Christ. In 20:30&31 John explains that faith is what he wants to produce in us

  • The reason for that faith is the testimony that he’s provided.
  • The response of faith is deciding to follow Jesus Christ.
  • The result of faith is eternal life in relationship with God forever.

And so we’re allowed to eavesdrop on two conversations that are intended to produce in us a growing faith. The first is with the Samaritan woman where the discussion concerns water and worship. Jesus offers to quench the spiritual thirst of an immoral non-Jewish woman. The second is with his disciples and centres on food and harvesting. Jesus justifies his mission to the Samaritans in terms of accomplishing the will of his Father. These two discussions have implications for us whether we’d describe ourselves as a follower of Jesus or whether we’d describe ourselves as an enquirer. The first discussion is perhaps most pertinent if we’d describe ourselves as an enquirer.

1. Jesus offered the Samaritan woman living water (1-26)

The first conversation is that which takes place between Jesus and the nameless woman from Samaria. Their discussion essentially concerns two things, the first is what Jesus describes as ‘living water’ and the second is what ‘true worshippers’ means. John introduces the narrative in (1).

4:1 Now when Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptising more disciples than John 2 (although Jesus himself did not baptise, but only his disciples), 3 he left Judea and departed again for Galilee. 4 And he had to pass through Samaria. 5 So he came to a town of Samaria called Sychar, near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was there; so Jesus, wearied as he was from his journey, was sitting beside the well. It was about the sixth hour [mid day].

The two conversations arise due to Jesus’ travel itinerary. There’s a necessity about this journey. When he visited the ‘Transport for Judea’ web site it would have given him two options. Two routes, the most geographically direct or the most theologically correct. Most Jews took the latter and skirted round Samaritan territory to avoid the risk of ritual defilement. But Jesus had to go through Samaria because there was something he had to do there. Let’s pick up the discussion in (7) and notice as we do the repeated word ‘water’.

a. The water that Jesus offers is eternal life

7 There came a woman of Samaria to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.” [Which is more polite in the original Greek]. 8 (For his disciples had gone away into the city to buy food.) 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?” (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.)

She recognised that Jesus had flouted social convention. Regrettably gender relationships weren’t as liberal as they are today. And sectarian relationships between the Jews and Samaritans were frosty. Samaritans had Jewish blood and they had Jewish beliefs but both had been diluted as a result of a deliberate policy of integration and assimilation following the Assyrian invasion in 722 BC. So although these were related races theirs was a relationship of suspicion and hostility. As far as the Jews were concerned the Samaritans were half-breeds.

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.”

Ever the evangelistic opportunist, Jesus seized on the opportunity to turn a normal conversation into a spiritual one. There’s a story about Vijay Menon, the converted Hindu, during his time in the City of London, trying just such a ploy. Around the time of the IRA bombings he tried to get into the Lloyd’s Building and was asked whether he had anything in his bag. He told the security guards it contained dynamite, whereupon he opened the bag to reveal a Bible.

11 The woman said to him, “Sir, you have nothing to draw water with, and the well is deep. Where do you get that living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob? He gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did his sons and his livestock.” She thought he was talking about a vibrant stream of fresh, bubbling water. But it becomes clear that Jesus has moved the discussion on to an entirely different plane. He was talking about giving her something that would provide spiritual satisfaction not physical satisfaction. 13 Jesus said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty forever. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” 15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”

Jesus offered the woman ‘living water’ that would eternally quench her spiritual thirst. He promised her an inexhaustible inner spring that would transform her and refresh and sustain her throughout this life into the next. One cross-reference will help us here. Turn on to John 7:37.

7:37 On the last day of the feast, the great day, Jesus stood up and cried out, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” 39 Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.

It’s clear isn’t it that the ‘living water’ that Jesus promised is satisfying eternal life given by the Spirit that only he can provide. Let’s resume the conversation in (16). Notice as we do the repeated word ‘worship’.

b. The worship that Jesus promotes is in spirit and truth

16 Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.” The change of subject was abrupt but perhaps Jesus recognised that she’d failed to understand the depths of her own need. 17 The woman answered him, “I have no husband.” [technically she’s right, as Jesus concedes] Jesus said to her, “You are right in saying, ‘I have no husband’; 18 for you have had five husbands, and the one you now have is not your husband. What you have said is true.” 19 The woman said to him, “Sir, I perceive that you are a prophet.

Jesus’ humiliating exposure of her immorality forced her to recognise that she was speaking to someone endowed with extraordinary spiritual perception. So she moved the discussion on, painfully aware of how discomforting this was. Perhaps she erected a theological smokescreen when she raised the vexed issue of geographical location for worship. But perhaps it was the start of a genuine enquiry that would lead her to faith.

20 Our fathers [Samaritans] worshiped on this mountain, but you say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship.” One issue of contention between Jews and Samaritans was where do you go to worship God. The Samaritan devotion to the Pentateuch meant that they thought that Mount Gerizim was the place. 21 Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father. Jesus responded saying something was about to happen that would make the disagreement about geographical location obsolete. 22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews. Jesus told her that she was ignorant of the truth and worshiped God incorrectly. 23 But the hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is seeking such people to worship him. 24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”

God is no longer approached on the basis of rituals offered in a certain place but a relationship through a person. True worshippers of God worship Him ‘in spirit and in truth’. That is, with our whole being [a spirit brought alive by the spirit] and in accordance with the truth [as it’s revealed in Jesus]. Some Christians are enthusiastic and emotional about our worship of God but it has little to do with the truth that Christ has revealed. But perhaps our failure is to be keen on the truth but passionless in our worship. Jesus said that true worship involves both.

25 The woman said to him, “I know that Messiah is coming (he who is called Christ). When he comes, he will tell us all things.” 26 Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am he.”

Jesus’ was not one theological opinion amongst many. He spoke with the authority invested in God’s promised King.

Implication

Jesus asks us this morning as he asked the woman, ‘What is it that we thirst after? How are we trying to quench that thirst? Have we found something to satisfy our thirst?’ He met a woman in the grind of her daily life and Jesus offered her something that would satisfy her for all eternity.

There’s perhaps nothing as intense a craving as thirsting after water. Imagine being in a desert parched and exhausted without a drop of water. Jesus says our lives without him are just like that. But they needn’t be. This woman was about as different as we could get from Nicodemus. He was male, Jewish, powerful, respected, orthodox and theologically trained. She was a woman, a Samaritan, unschooled, without influence, despised and immoral. But they both needed Jesus and Jesus offered them both eternal life. Whichever end of the social or moral spectrum we may find ourselves Jesus offers us the ‘living water’ of eternal life. This woman plays us onside. There is no one beyond the reach of Jesus’ gracious offer of eternal life. None of us here need think that Jesus Christ is not for them.

2. Jesus persuaded his disciples to labour for the harvest (27-42)

The second conversation takes place between Jesus and his disciples. It concerned food and harvest but it’s really about why Jesus is offering eternal life to the Samaritans. For in this discussion Jesus justified what he’s been doing.

a. The food that sustained Jesus was his Father’s will

27 Just then his disciples came back. They marvelled that he was talking with a woman, but no one said, “What do you seek?” or, “Why are you talking with her?” [presumably out of politeness] 28 So the woman left her water jar and went away into town and said to the people, [she discovered that this was something worth putting work to one side for] 29 “Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?” She realised that what she’d heard had to be shared. Even with people who’d ostracised her. 30 They went out of the town and were coming to him. 31 Meanwhile the disciples were urging him, saying, “Rabbi, eat.” 32 But he said to them, “I have food to eat that you do not know about.” 33 So the disciples said to one another, “Has anyone brought him something to eat?” 34 Jesus said to them, “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to accomplish his work.

Jesus explained that the food that sustained and nourished him was to obey his Father. And the specific issue that occupied his attention was taking the offer of eternal life to the Samaritans. As he goes on to say, look at (35).

b. The harvest that Jesus gathered was Samaritan believers

35 Do you not say, ‘There are yet four months, then comes the harvest’? Look, I tell you, lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are white for harvest. 36 Already the one who reaps is receiving wages and gathering fruit for eternal life, so that sower and reaper may rejoice together. 37 For here the saying holds true, ‘One sows and another reaps.’ 38 I sent you to reap that for which you did not labour. Others have laboured, and you have entered into their labour.”

Jesus recalled two prominent proverbial sayings of the time. One was accurate but the other failed to do justice to the situation. The first proverb is ‘there are yet four months then comes the harvest’. It assumes a period between sowing and reaping the harvest. But whilst that might be the case agriculturally it’s not the case spiritually. Jesus told them to look around them at the situation. Focussed on the incoming Samaritans it was ripe for harvest. Reaping the harvest was the work that his Father has given him to do. The second proverb is ‘one sows and another reaps’. And his point was that in their evangelistic labours they were to benefit from the labours of others. In this discussion Jesus justifies what he was doing. The will of his father that he so longed to obey was to take salvation to the world. And so he deliberately walks through Samaria, meets an immoral woman, offers her life and then does the same to all the villagers. And they gladly accept.

Implication

Jesus asks us today as he asked his disciples, ‘Is the food that sustains us obeying the will of God? Do we gain our spiritual nourishment from living according to God’s will? Have we go the appetite for offering God’s salvation to the world?’ We’ve got a fabulous opportunity these next few weeks to invite people to hear of God’s salvation in Jesus Christ. We’ll find the details of our Christmas events on the front of the service sheets. So often we’re fearful on intruding on people and making a nuisance of ourselves. But we need to think about what we’re offering. We’re not asking people to join our religious club. We’re offering people ‘living water’ that will eternally quench our intense craving for spiritual meaning.

Conclusion

39 Many Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, “He told me all that I ever did.” 40 So when the Samaritans came to him, they asked him to stay with them, and he stayed there two days. 41 And many more believed because of his word. 42 They said to the woman, “It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Saviour of the world.”

Jesus is the Saviour for the world. That’s why he went to the world.